Peoples Congress Agenda, 2011 *Corporate Enablers* Corporate Hall of Shame * Invited Organizations and Speakers * Contact

 


You may wonder why we are so focused on Corporate Accountability and, at the same time, wonder what good will it do to address these problems. What will change when we regulate these multinational corporations? Plenty. The recent spate of corporate scandals is only the tip of an iceberg that is on a collision course with our Democracy. Although the call for accountability is getting louder, corporations, and our government, will not hear the cries for meaningful reform until we organize into one giant voice for real change. That is the intention of the Peoples Congress. There are so many organizations, groups, and individuals working to create a better world, and we all share a common problem. Runaway corporate power is preventing the free and meaningful exercise of democracy, and our government is doing everything it can to embolden those powers and to weaken our government.

To that end, this call to action is being offered as a solution to a looming crisis. With your support and participation in the Peoples Congress 2008, the era of global dominance by multinational corporations will close and a new era of democracy, hope, and justice will begin. Our dreams for a sustainable world do not have to remain dreams. If we gather our strength, collect our will, focus our energy, and ask to be heard, tomorrow will be more than a shadow of our hopes. Obama has asked for our help and participation. Are you at the table?

Solutions
This is an invitation to become involved in this project.

What is proposed is that we organize a symbolic "occupation" of the Capitol, using churches and school dorms rather than public parks. This, "occupation" would arrange ongoing meetings between constituents and their legislators, for a period up to one week. In these meetings constituent groups would present reform legislation, of various kinds, that confront the corporate takeover of our democracy and provide meaningful alternatives to
current policies.

This action would be combined with press conferences,
media events, and one (or several) large public demonstrations.

The potential for this action is great because the issues affecting everyday people are reaching the boiling point. We are under assault from our own government, and the past four years have shown that professional politicians are simply not up to the task of defending us. The truth is, politicians are constrained from taking action without guaranteed support from voters.

Responding to this fact, an unprecedented number of grassroots organizations got involved in opposition to the Iraq War and the Presidential election, as constituents attempted to create the popular support necessary for change. The results have been mixed, but the infrastructure for a new social movement is now in place.

A number of issues are in crisis, affecting multiple constituent groups. The issues include the Iraq war, the potential military draft, election reform, budget deficits, Social Security, environmental protections, separation of church and state, women's rights, and others. The potential for cooperation among affected groups is great. If well organized, this effort could include constituents as diverse as the AARP and United for Peace and Justice.

The unique opportunity here is to present these issues in their larger
context: the conflict that exists between progressive democratic values and the modern conservative movement. The threats facing progressives are all linked to one issue: the underlying hostility conservatives bear towards democracy.

Democracy requires constraints that limit the influence of
concentrated wealth and power, and conservatives have never reconciled themselves to this fact. These constraints include guarantees for the rights of all citizens, regardless of race or gender; the redistribution of at least some wealth; and the constraint of law, applied evenly regardless of social position or corporate affiliation. Progress on these issues, once taken for granted among liberals, is under attack as never before.

The modern conservative movement is advancing its agenda through stealth, misrepresentation, and bare-knuckle politicking. It has successfully built a popular consensus for policies that actually harm the vast majority of citizens.

The Summer 2011 effort would be an opportunity to confront that consensus, with specific, positive policies of our own, that we must undertake to explain in terms that are understandable to the average person. What would make this action unique and effective is that it could combine old-fashioned campaign politics with street theater and genuine Populist passion. If well organized, the event could avoid the problems associated with large demonstrations, like police violence and hostile media coverage. Efforts should be made to involve progressive legislators, meanwhile putting an uncomfortable spotlight on their conservative colleagues. Our event could
actually fit a preexisting media story line: the wholesome democratic process on display, as it was in the Ukraine this past December, or in Tiananmen Square in 1989. This would help facilitate positive media coverage.

A number of organizing options have been discussed. One way to describe the general approach is to compare it to MoveOn's organizing efforts in the summer of 2002, when groups across the country met with their respective Senators in all 50 states to urge them to oppose the looming Iraq war. Each constituent group held as large a public demonstration as it could, while a small contingent met with the Senator's office. The "lobbying" envisioned for Summer 2011 would cover a wider range of topics, and would occur at the
DC offices of both houses of Congress. One suggestion is for groups to also meet back home at the state offices, which would allow people who cannot travel to participate, and would increase opportunities for publicity. Conceivably, many constituent groups could use this opportunity to present ideas for specific causes, while event organizers would focus on the overarching themes unifying the many causes represented.

There are many details to work out. This action will obviously not
happen without involvement from some large national groups. Activists have begun the process of contacting representatives from grassroots organizations, developing a comprehensive plan that will attract the support of larger groups, which have the capacity to adopt these ideas and bring them to fruition.

Meanwhile, the exciting potential of this event is undeniable. We are still soliciting feedback. If you are interested in spreading the word and would like to help add to our list of contacts, please respond by e-mail to:

John Mulkins
W est Coast coordinator, The People's Congress 2011

johnmulkins@aol.com

or

Melinda Sample
East Coast coordinator, The People's Congress 2011

msample2@nycap.rr.com

We want your input now.

This site will evolve as input is generated and ideas come together. Here is a list of ways you can help this action succeed.

1.) Endorsements are a way of building support for the action. If you believe the Peoples Congress could be effective, you should endorse this action proposal by contacting us through e-mail. As organizations add their endorsements, the potential of developing a strong relationship between those organizations becomes a reality. Funding becomes a possibility, and the action itself evolves into an event.

2.) Let us know you are interested. If you have experience in developing actions, let us know, and everyone, stay in touch.

3.) Generate more understanding of the issue.

4.) Enlist support from friends.

5.) We will need skilled activists to chair various committees. Those committees include:

Promotion
Funding
Permits
Site Management
Media and Communication
Security
Sound and Stage
Transportation
Legislation